With Father’s Day just around the corner it is interesting to examine how some groups are taking advantage of this diary date to draw crowds.

Church On The Move in the US have done just this with a rather clever video called the Dad Life which already has 1,458,052 views to date including mentions  in NY Times and on CNN.

Yesterday Kelloggs (US)voluntarily recalled a variety of cereals due to a strange odour.  But how are they faring with regard to online crisis communications management?

First up a check of their website shows a recall message on the homepage so they are off to a good start. Within the recall message there are a range of well crafted FAQs regarding the recall.

Viewing the Australian Kelloggs website there is no mention of the recall yet Australians hooked into Twitter and reading about the recall will be wondering this morning if their cereal is affected.

Now on to Twitter… there is certainly a lot of chatter this morning from consumers regarding the recall (see below) 

tffny705264: RT @mykidseatfree: Kellogg Issues Massive Cereal Recall; 28-Million Boxes Pulled – http://bit.ly/aAOjXo http://myloc.me/8pFzw 40 minutes ago via UberTwitter

kmohara: Recall on Kelloggs Fruit Loops, Apple Jacks, Honey Smacks and Pops. http://ow.ly/23sBI

AndYaSayChIcitY: RT @ThickGirlThin: Re: recalled cereal. http://www.webmd.com/food-recipes/news/20100625/kelloggs-cereal-recall-due-to-odd-smell

Interestingly, it does not appear that Kelloggs have an official Twitter handle with which they could certainly respond and keep consumers updated hour by hour. 

I certainly hope in the least they have claimed their Twitter name or we could see someone having fun with the Kelloggs brand in the next few hours and day ala BP style.

Update! the Twitter handle looks to be taken by a consumer not the organisation view twitter handle – the last entry is about basketball! I have followed this character to see what unfolds in the coming days.

It is still surprising when organisations are not claiming their name or using Twitter as an online crisis communication tool.  Back   in 2007 when writing for Freshchat I noted the use of Twitter for this purpose but back then this Twitter thing was still reasonably new. Today no organisation can claim that Twitter is new or untested.

In fact only recently in Australia the ACCC encouraged Australian food companies to embrace Twitter and other web 2.0 mediums to get the message out to consumers – Twitter has indeed gone mainstream.

The Fruit Loops Community Page on Facebook will certainly be pulling in some negative comments over the next few hours so you would be hoping that Kelloggs are monitoring that page as will the Honey Smacks page.  This is a good lesson for organisations – even if you don’t want to have a Facebook prescence Community Pages exists so at least monitor those and get proactive on the site.

The company also has a  Froot Loops application on Facebook so it will be interesting to see if any messages appear via this mechanism (this is one of the cereals recalled).

Quick search of YouTube on the subject – nothing as yet although news reports regarding the recall have already appeared right now a statement from a Kelloggs official on youtube would be recommended but will they respond? it is possible that creative types might have a field day with the recall so expect to see some humorous videos on this channel in coming days.

Update: there is already one consumer recall video posted as of 1pm today.  Also notable was a news video that accidentally mixed up the Kelloggs story with another – to interesting effect.

Bloggers – yes they will be out in force and already there are murmerings about the cereal recall so let’s hope Kellogg’s have their social media monitoring in place and their blogger relations under control. Here’s one recall blog post I quite like regarding the quantities recalled.

Let’s not forget Online Forums and it is evident that the US  ’mommy forums’ are already quite active which you may expect but less obvious forums such as Pirate 4×4  (for offroad vehicles) are also discussing the recall and by nature the product itself.

Google Trends (in the US) is showing Kelloggs Recall as number 2 only surpassed by the World Cup.  It is interesting to note that no adwords have been purchased at the current time.

Naturally the issue is hitting online news sites and The Huffington Post have a nice wrap up including integrated Twitter feed.

Lessons for Online Crisis Communications

1. Use a variety of online platforms to get the message out – a simple line on your website simply does not cut it anymore

2. Claim your name in all the online platforms to ensure no spoofing of your brand occurs particularly during a crisis

3. Local organisations should  monitor the international situation and quickly get a message out on their websites that local stock are not affected (if this is the case) we are clearly operating in a global economy.

4. Twitter is a vital online crisis comms platform – understand it and use it in a crisis. Develop and stick to a relevant hashtag.

5. Don’t leave it till a crisis occurs to integrate online comms platforms into your existing crisis comms plans

6. Have a good social media monitoring system in place and monitor it regularly

7. Research what terms people are searching for online and ensure they are incorporated into your content strategy.  Understand the basics of SEO – if you are a communicator this is critical.

8. Buy adwords for the key terms to ensure that your messages get through.  Ensure your link sends consumers directly to your recall page.

In a recent study by Digital Brand Expressions, 52% of social marketers are operating “without a game plan,” similar to the 50% found in April 2010 by R2integrated this was discussed recently in an emarketer article.

The following image shows the activities that organisations are currently participating in indicating that many organisations are clearly at the beginning of their social media journey building the foundations for more sophisticated activities.

The study also showed that the creation/maintenance of social media communications plans are being created predominantly by marketing and corporate communications which is to be expected.

It would however be interesting to know how many other departments had a seat at the table when the social media plans were developed.  For example, developing a thorough social media policy alone would need input from HR, IT, marketing and others gaining that buy-in from the majority of departmental areas is critical if you are (a) going to get the strategy off the ground and (b) gain the ROI that you need.

A new report from the Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project that looks at reputation and online identity management in the age of social media found that:

More than half (57%) of adult internet users say they have used a search engine to look up their name and see what information was available about them online, up from 47% who did so in 2006.

Young adults, far from being indifferent about their digital footprints, are the most active online reputation managers in several dimensions. For example, more than two-thirds (71%) of social networking users ages 18-29 have changed the privacy settings on their profile to limit what they share with others online.

Mary Madden, Senior Research Specialist at the Internet & American Life Project and lead author of the report says search engines and social media sites now play a central role in building one’s identity online.

• Monitoring the digital footprints of others has become more common: 38% of internet users have searched online for information about their friends, up from 26% in 2006.
• People are more likely to be found online: 40% of internet users say they have been contacted by someone from their past who found them online, up from 20% who reported the same in 2006.
• Social networking users are especially attuned to the intricacies of online reputation management: The size of the adult social networking population has more than doubled since 2006, and 65% of these profile owners have changed the privacy settings for their profile to restrict what they share with others online.

When compared with older users, young adults are more likely to restrict what they share and whom they share it with. Those ages 18-29 are more likely than older adults to say:

• They take steps to limit the amount of personal information available about them online: 44% of young adult internet users say this, compared with 33% of internet users ages 30-49, 25% of those ages 50-64 and 20% of those ages 65 and older.
• They change privacy settings: 71% of social networking users ages 18-29 have changed the privacy settings on their profile to limit what they share with others online. By comparison, just 55% of SNS users ages 50-64 have changed their privacy settings.
• They delete unwanted comments: 47% social networking users ages 18-29 have deleted comments that others have made on their profile, compared with just 29% of those ages 30-49 and 26% of those ages 50-64.
• They remove their name from photos: 41% of social networking users ages 18-29 say they have removed their name from photos that were tagged to identify them, compared with just 24% of SNS users ages 30-49 and only 18% of those ages 50-64.

The report is interesting reading given the recent Facebook privacy issues.

The full report can be downloaded at http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Reputation-Management.aspx

(Source: Pro Bono News)

A nice summary from Forrester recently about the seven things organisations must do because of social media.

I particularly like the fact they don’t just focus on the pr or  marketing department but other areas such as customer service.

Read the Forrester List here and then check off which ones your organisation is currently achieving.

Courtesy of www.hardknoxlife.com Vivaldi Partners recently released a study entitled “Social Currency” that looks at why brands need to build and nurture social currency.

Vivaldi’s founder, Erich Joachimsthaler explains Social Currency is:

“the extent to which people share the brand or information about the brand with others as part of their everyday social lives… Social currency is not  just about conversation, buzz or community.  It is all this and much more. It does not impact every brand equally and certain levers of social currency are more important than others in driving value for companies.”

Social Currency as described in the report consists of the following six levers:

Affiliation: What share of your users has a sense of community?

Conversation: What share of your brand users recognizes and stirs buzz?

Utility: How many of your users derive value from interacting with other users?

Advocacy: How many users act as disciples and stand up for your brand?

Information: How many of your users feel they exchange fruitful information with others?

Identity: How many of your users can identify other users?

While there are no real surprises in the list above it is a nice succinct checklist for organisations when dealing in the social space.

A recent report from  Chadwick Martin Bailey and iModerate found that social media friends and followers ‘feel more inclined to purchase from the brands they are fans of’.  The highlights of the report were:

• More than one-half of Facebook fans said they are more likely to make a purchase for at least a few brands, and 67% of Twitter followers reported the same.
• Why were fans members of sites? Among Facebook fans, the top reasons were being a customer (49%) and to show support (42%), with discounts and promotions coming in third (40%). Another 34% simply said it was fun and entertaining to become a fan.
• On Twitter, being a customer won out (51%), with discounts (44%) and fun (42%) rounding out the top three.

Ever thought about running a promotion on Facebook?

Did you realise Facebook has guidelines regarding promotions?

You can read them here http://www.facebook.com/promotions_guidelines.php

It is important to do so to ensure you are complying with the regulations.

I was on a panel last week for Innovative Intranets. One of the topics was What’s Next. One of the areas discussed was portability. If you have workers in the field/on the road  getting access to their Intranet on a smartphone was going to be critical and designing the Intranet around simpicity ( ie a different version) was key.

This conversation also led to geo-tagging and location based apps and how they are starting to gain traction.  The following article Is it time for marketers to check in to location based social services by Smartbrief is certainly worth a read if you want to come to grips with an area cited by many authorities to be in the top 10 list of future trends for social media marketers.

IT companies have SLA (service level agreements) for their clients in terms of responsiveness but do social media strategists also have them?

If you are tweeting on behalf of your client (and while this is not ideal  it may be necessary due to the squeeze on marketing depts) do you say how regularly you will tweet ? From a risk management point of view I think an SLA is vital. If someone tweets your clients organisation in an emergency situation who is going to respond? who is expected to respond to that tweet at 11.55pm? what is the understanding in your business about rapid response from a crisis communications perspective? best get that on the table and ensure all parties have clear expectations.

In the ideal world organisations would engage themselves albiet being mentored along the way. It is simpy better that way, the organisations have the deep knowledge to respond internally to situations that arise and employee involvement is vital to engage honestly with consumers and create powerful change within the organisation itself.  Yet, many times clients ask social media marketers to take on the whole kit and kaboodle – devise the strategy and implement the engagement and many times this is indeed necessary.

Apart from the obvious pitfall of the client not being totally involved! what are the logistical pitfalls you have encountered? and what do you think others should be aware of if they undertake this arrangement?